Dawn's picture

This week's ECG of the Week is from an elderly woman who suffered an acute occlusion of the right coronary artery.  The ECG clearly shows ST elevation in leads II, III, and aVF, indicating inferior wall injury.  In this case, this ECG was obtained in the field by paramedics, and was the second ECG done on this patient. For this tracing, the paramedics obtained V3 and V4 on the right side to better view the right ventricle. V3 and V4 right clearly show ST elevation as well, indicating RVMI.  The slight coving and elevation observable in V1 is also an indication of RV involvement, and the ST depression in V2 indicates posterior wall injury.  All of this results from a proximal lesion of the RCA in this patient.  Such a lesion carries a high morbidity and mortality.

Taking the time to obtain a right ventricular lead is controversial in some settings.  Some believe the patient's hemodynamic condition should be treated, regardless of the presence or absence of ST elevation in right chest leads.  Others find it very helpful to know that the right ventricle is affected.  In this case, paramedics in this community have a protocol to avoid the use of nitroglycerine in RVMI patients, even when the BP is adequate.  So, for them, it is important to have the information gathered from V Right leads.

The rhythm here is interesting, as well, and not at all uncommon for IWMI patients.  The baseline artifact makes it a bit difficult to march out all the P waves, but it appears they are sinus P waves that are slightly irregular at a rate of 52 to 54.  The PR intervals appear to be progressively prolonging, but there is no "grouped beating" observable on this short strip.  A lack of a concurrent Lead II rhythm strip also makes it difficult to determine the rhythm, as Lead II does have very visible P waves, and would be helpful.  The regularity of the narrow complex bradycardia points to a junctional escape rhythm, which would make this a third-degree AVB at the AV node level, which is very common with IWMI.  What do you think?

This month's strip from Jason Roediger's ECG Challenge blogpost is a nice complement to the strip presented here.  His is much clearer, and has a Lead II rhythm strip.  Do you think these ECGs show the same rhythm, or two different rhythms?

For an excellent discussion of "AV Dissociation" vs. "AV Block", go to Christopher Watford's Ask the Expert post.  Thanks very much to ECG Guru Sebastian Garay for this interesting ECG.

Rate this content: 
Average: 3.5 (2 votes)

Comments

ekgpress@mac.com's picture

Superb teaching tracing by Dawn. The rhythm first. I agree completely with Dawn's assessment - that for clarity, I've labeled beats and added arrows. GO TO: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yw52cvysk0ya7mt/Dawn%20ECG-1-13-2013.png

The KEY clue that something is "amiss" is in lead II. There we definitely see 2 P waves with different PR intervals.

  • As mentioned - baseline artifact and low amplitude atrial activity make interpretation difficult. Added to the mix is the phenomenon known as "ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia" - that is common in high-grade 2nd and 3rd degree AV blocks. Poor coronary perfusion is thought to be the mechanism for a somewhat irregular atrial rate - which in theory shows slight shortening of the PR interval after a QRS complex (because the QRS temporarily helped with perfusion).
  • Wish we had a long lead II rhythm strip on this one .... Without that - you need some "imagination", but I think my arrows at the above link march things out fairly well for a ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia.
  • The CLUE that this is then likely to be 3rd degree (complete) AV bock - is that the ventricular escape rate (which is junctional given narrow QRS) is regular !!! The rate is probably slow enough (a bit under 50/min) to allow P waves adequate opportunity, yet they still fail to conduct (ideally I'd like a slightly longer lead II rhythm strip in order to be 100% sure this is 3rd degree AV block).
  • As Dawn mentions - 3rd degree with AV nodal escape is not uncommon with this type of infarct. In many (most) cases - the AV block is transient - and typically resolves stepwise (ie 3rd - to 2nd - to 1st - to NSR).

Next the Infarct localization.

  • As Dawn mentions - we see acute inferior ST elevation.
  • Note 2 additional clues to proximal RCA occlusion location = ST elevation in lead III > II - and marked reciprocal ST dep in lead aVL > lead I.
  • Lead V2 manifests a positive "mirror test" = diagnostic of acute posterior involvement.
  • Beautiful example (!!!) of marked ST elevation in V3R,V4R - though as Dawn implies - given that we KNOW this is acute proximal RCA - and - that we see ST coving in lead V1 but then marked ST dep in lead V2 - we can almost certainly predict acute RV involvement without the right-sided leads. Clearly - obtaining right sided leads provides gorgeous ECG confirmation - BUT - if time was a factor (in terms of expediting door-to-balloon time) - right-sided leads are probably not essential in the field ...

GREAT tracing!

Ken Grauer, MD  www.kg-ekgpress.com   [email protected] 

All our content is FREE & COPYRIGHT FREE for non-commercial use

Please be courteous and leave any watermark or author attribution on content you reproduce.